After the Order of Melchizedek

 After the Purchase of Melchizedek Essay

Adventist Intercontinental Institute

of Advanced Research

Theological College

" Following the Order of Melchizedek”

A Term Paper

Submitted in Partial Completion

of the Requirement of the Training course:

THST 619 Doctrine with the Sanctuary

by

Ralph Deb Bock

October 2009

Table of Articles

CHAPTER eleven

INTRODUCTION1

ASSERTION OF THE PROBLEM4

SIGNIFICANCE FROM THE STUDY4

AIM OF THE STUDY4

DELIMITATION5

METHODOLOGY5

CHAPTER 28

TYPOLOGY OF JESUS AND MELCHIZEDEK7

WHAT IS TYPOLOGY? 7

WHO IS MELCHIZEDEK? 8

FOLLOWING THE ORDER OF MELCHIZEDEK10

PHASE 316

SYNOPSIS, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSION16

BIBLIOGRAPHY19

CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION

WHAT IS THE MEANING OF THE EXPRESSION " FOLLOWING YOUR ORDER OF MELCHIZEDEK? ” PSALM 128 SPEAKS ABOUT A PERSON WHO IS A KING AND A CLERGYMAN, BUT IN THE HISTORY OF HIS HOME COUNTRY OF ISRAEL THERE WAS NEVER SUCH A KING. MAYBE THE PSALM SPEAKS ABOUT A FUTURE KING-PRIEST. IT IS CLEAR THAT IT OFFERS NOT WITH A HISTORICAL CALIFORNIA KING, BUT WITH THE MESSIAH.[1] The prediction of Jesus' priesthood according to the buy of Melchizedek indicated the Aaronic priesthood was transitory (Heb 7 verses 11–14), and imperfect—that is, salvation from sin—was not possible through the Aaronic priesthood. This meant that God intended to change the priestly law, allowing for one who was not a rejeton of Aaron to become a Large Priest. Once the new Large Priest following the order of Melchizedek came, the typical priesthood would end (verses 15–19). Christ started to be priest, not on the basis of genealogical ties, although by a keen declaration. His priesthood is permanent since His a lot more indestructible.[2] This is certainly called in biblical theology typology. Regardless of whether typology may legitimately be embraced in the interpretation of certain messianic prophecies is by far the most debatable question. One area of OT typology was that of common individuals who served as prototypes both of different individuals within the OT and of Christ; additionally , the Melchizedek of Genesis 14: 18-20 served because an individual form of the Messiah within the OT, as evinced in Psalm 110: four; and that the publisher of the Book of Hebrews utilized the Melchizedekian typology already utilized within the OT canon to further his arguments for the supremacy from the priesthood of Jesus to that of the Levites. [3] Matt Henry and et 's. reference to Hebrew 7. one particular that Melchizedek met Abraham returning through the rescue of Lot, Melchizedek's name, " King of Righteousness, ” doubtless suited to his character, marked him as a type of the Messiah wonderful kingdom. The name of his metropolis signified " Peace; ” and as Full of Peacefulness he typified Christ, the Prince of Peace, the truly great Reconciler of God and man. Few things are recorded for the beginning or end of his life; thus he typically was similar to the Boy of God, whose lifestyle is via everlasting to everlasting, who no one that was before Him, and will have no one come following Him, in His priesthood. All of Scripture honors the fantastic King of Righteousness and Peace, the glorious Substantial Priest and Savior; and the more we all examine this, the more we shall be persuaded, that the testimony of Jesus is the soul of prediction. [4] There are strong parallels between Melchizedek and Christ: both are the Sons of God, clergyman of the Buy of Melchizedek, King of Righteous, California king of Peace, appointed simply by God, everlasting priesthood, and preexistent.

Declaration of the Issue

The condition this daily news espouses is definitely embodied inside the questions: What was so particular about the order of Melchizedek? For what reason would Goodness juxtapose the order of Melchizedek to that particular of Jesus if generally there where not any credence to it?

Relevance of the study

The study can be significant because it will explore the intertextual study of Melchizedek pertaining to Jesus Christ. The research is vital as it...

Bibliography: CHICKEN, CHAD L. 2000. " TYPOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION WITHIN THE OLD TESTAMENT: MELCHIZEDEKIAN TYPOLOGY. " CONCORDIA LOG 26.

Broomall, Wick. 60. Baker Dictionary of Theology. Everett Farrenheit. Harrison, Geoffrey W. Bromiley, and Carl F. H. Henry, eds. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker.

Bullinger, Electronic. W. late 1960s. Figures of Speech Utilized in the Holy book. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker.

Danker, ainsi que al., Greek-English Lexicon in the New Testament, Chicago: College or university of Chi town, 2000.

Dunnill John, Covenant and sacrifice in the Notification to the Hebrews. SNTS seventy five; Cambridge, GLASS, 1992.

Gane, Roy " Altar Call” Daidem, 99.

Petuchowski, Jakob Josef. " The questionable figure of Melchizedek. " Hebrew Union College Total annual 28, 1957.

Review and Harold, Feb. 18, 90.

Terry, M. S. 1890. Biblical Hermeneutics. New York, NY: Eaton & Mains.

[2]Raoul. Dederen, vol. 12, Guide of Seventh-Day Adventist Theology, (electronic male impotence., Logos Library System; Discourse Reference Series Hagerstown, MD: Review and Herald Submitting Association, 2001, c2000), 390.

[3]Bird, Chad L. 2000. " Typological Interpretation Within the Old Testament: Melchizedekian Typology" Concordia Journal 26, no . 1: 36-52.

[4]Matthew Henry and Jones Scott, Matthew Henry is actually Concise Comments, (Oak Harbor, WA: Trademarks Research Systems, 1997), Heb 7: 1 )

[5]Dederen, Raoul, vol. 12, Handbook of Seventh-Day Adventist Theology, (electronic ed., Logos Library System; Commentary Research Series Hagerstown, MD: Review and Herald Publishing Connection, 2001, c2000), 390.

[6] Bullinger, Electronic. W. 1968. Figures of Speech Employed in the Holy book. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker.

[7] Terry, M. S i9000. 1890. Biblical Hermeneutics. New York, NY: Eaton & Mains.

[8] Broomall, Wick. 1960. Baker Book of Theology. Everett N. Harrison, Geoffrey W. Bromiley, and Carl F. They would. Henry, eds. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker.

[10] Assessment and Harold, Feb. 18, 1890.

[12] Danker, ain al., Greek-English Lexicon with the New Legs,[pic] Chicago: College or university of Chicago, 2000, 989.

Essay on Compare and Contrast Budhism Christianity

News